The National Brass Virtuosi is
a brass quintet comprised of members of the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra,
the Milwaukee Symphony and the Houston Symphony Orchestra:
Michael Sachs - Trumpet
- Cleveland
Mark Neihaus - Trumpet - Milwaukee
Michael Mayhew - Horn - Cleveland
Richard Stout - Trombone - Cleveland
Dave Kirk - Tuba - Houston
I was notified of this
performance by email with a message from Dave Kirk. I was excited about it
because I've always wanted to hear Mike Sachs play. Mike was once a member
of the Houston Symphony Orchestra and he is almost a trumpet legend here
in town. So I was greatly anticipating this performance.
An Embarrassing Moment
The room the quintet performed
in was a small lecture hall, very intimate.....maybe too intimate for
someone who has his eight year old son with him. :-)
I take Alex to a lot of
concerts, both concerts I attend in the audience and also concerts I
perform in. He is very well behaved most of the time. He has to be or I
wouldn't take him. But this was a little different because the room was so
intimate and even to whisper you feel as if you're broadcasting what you
say to everyone in the room.
Alex was asking me why I
wasn't on stage. He was a little confused because he had been to three of
my own performances already that week. So while I was explaining my reason
for being there, the quintet began their first piece. In a bigger, less
intimate hall, I wouldn't have felt so embarrassed about it.
And I guess the reason I'm
telling you about this is to show just how good of a situation this was.
The room we were in is excellently built, in my opinion. We've rehearsed
in there before with the Texas Brass and I always thought it would make a
great recital venue for smaller audiences.
So here we were, in such close
proximity with such great players....ready to hear them, no, to
experiences their sounds and musicianship in ways that are simply not
possible in their home symphony halls.
"Ricercare" by
Andrea Gabrieli, arr. Neihaus
The first piece of the
performance was a Gabrieli arrangement written by one of the trumpet
players, Mark Neihaus. He did really good work on this piece and I need to
talk to Dave Kirk about the possibility of purchasing a copy from Mark.
I'm having trouble recalling the particulars of the piece, but it gave me
the impression that this is a much more virtuosic work than any of the
Gabrieli compositions that I'm familiar with. There
was a high level of intensity exhibited on this piece, making it a great
opener for the performance.
"Quintet No. 3" by
Victor Ewald
For the Ewald, the trumpet
players moved to one side of the group while the trombone player moved to
the front left (stage left). Also, the trumpets switched to B Flat
trumpets, which they played for the rest of the performance.
I thought it was significant
that they played on B Flat trumpets for most of the concert. I have always
enjoyed the sound of the B Flat in smaller ensembles. I know I'm over
generalizing and maybe this has nothing to do with their reasons for using
the B Flats, but I've always felt that the sound of the B Flat trumpets
blends better in a small brass ensemble.
For those of you who are not
familiar with the Ewald quintets, they are some of the ONLY Romantic brass
chamber pieces written specifically and originally for brass. If I'm not
mistaken, the original instrumentation varies slightly from today's
standard quintet instrumentation, but they are commonly performed this
way.
"Triangles" by John
Stevens
Triangles features the low
brass trio; horn, trombone and tuba. Dave Kirk introduced the work as
being representative of it's author's experience. By that he means that it
includes a variety of textures and styles ranging from modern
"classical" styles to more commercial styles. From previous
conversations with Dave, I know how much respect he has for this kind of
musical variety and it was a pleasure to experience the presentation.
One thing I really liked about
this piece is the use of mutes. I guess I had never heard the muted tuba
in a brass quintet. It gave me all kinds of ideas.....but two weeks too
late, I'm afraid. I just published my 21 Brass Quintets.
"Laudes" by Jan
Bach
This was my favorite piece in
the concert. I'm not very familiar with Jan Bach's works. The only work of
his I had heard in the past was a tape my friend, Chris Parks, sent of his
brass quintet at Boston University. But I think I will quickly become a
big fan of his writing.
It's a modern piece, very
French sounding if I'm not mistaken. I noticed something in this piece
that was equally noticeable in the tape that Chris sent me. There's a lot
of what I have learned to call "pyramids" in in these pieces.
Pyramids are musical effects achieved when each part plays a pitch in the
chord but all at different times. Some people call these "bell
tones". This effect creates a building tension, especially when used
in the way that Jan Bach uses it. He uses dissonant intervals and the
entrances are in irregular rhythms.
I guess that's one of the
things that separates modern music from traditional. Modern music utilizes
more effects than traditional musics of the past. Compositional devices
are used merely for the sounds they produce and not necessarily of the
functional roles they play in the melodic or harmonic structure of the
music. And that's what makes Jan Bach's pieces different from other brass
works is his use of these effects (this being based on my limited
experience listening to his music).
Overall Performance
The ensemble was billed as the
"National Brass Virtuosi" and their performance seems to have
made that point very clear. In many ways, this was very difficult music
and it was performed effortlessly. It was certainly a virtuosic
performance.
But this is not to take away
from other aspects of their performance. Take pitch for example. They say
that no one ever notices good pitch. You don't notice pitch until it's bad
or until there are specific pitch problems. But for some reason, I noticed
the pitch in their ensemble playing and it was fantastic.
And their performance was just
as expressive as it was virtuosic. The opener was "in your face"
flashy kind of playing which was greatly contrasted with the more soupy
sweet lyricism necessary to make the Ewalds sound right.
I thought that they did all of
this very well. Extremely well considering that they are not a regular
performing ensemble. This was a project that Dave Kirk and Mike Sachs have
been wanting to put together for a number of years. So I think they did a
heck of a job for their first outing and I hope they make some more
appearances in the future.
Mike Sachs
I have to admit that, although
I would have attended the performance whether Mike Sachs was in the group
or not, I was greatly anticipating the opportunity to finally hear his
playing. And in such an intimate context no less.
To me, Mike Sachs is a Houston
legend. He was a member of the Houston Symphony Orchestra up until the
year I came to Houston. Friends of mine have studied with him and I've
been hearing stories about him and his playing over all these years.
One of the most meaningful
stories comes from Dick Schaffer. I studied with Schaffer for about two
and a half years and during that time I still wanted to be an orchestral
player. So we spent most of our lesson time working to meet that
objective.
I don't exactly remember how
the subject came up, but Schaffer told me that he was on the audition
committee when Mike Sachs won the Houston audition. He told me that the
vote was unanimous. In a later lesson, I asked him what it was about
Sachs' playing that caused the committee to know that he was the right
candidate for the job. His response has stayed with me over all these
years. He said,
"When Mike Sachs
played, you could actually feel his confidence. There was no uncertainty
to his playing at all." (not an exact quote)
Like I said, this statement
stuck in my mind for years and became the goal that I worked towards while
I was pursuing the orchestral "thing".
So, after hearing all of these
stories, I was thrilled with the prospects of hearing him in this
performance. I wanted to hear what Schaffer was talking about. I wanted to
see if he would communicate that same confidence to me.
Did he?
He most certainly did. It was
almost unnatural. I don't mean that in a negative nor critical way. It's
just that I've come to expect a certain degree of "iffy-ness"
from brass players. Even the greatest players sometimes sound as if they
lack conviction in their playing (and I STRESS
"sometimes")......especially when performing very technical
pieces like the ones programmed on this concert.
For this reason, I would LOVE
to see Sachs do some solo recordings. I checked a few internet sources and
didn't find any listed. With the kind of gusto and conviction he plays
with, he could easily be one of the greatest trumpet soloists of our day.
Coming Back Down to Earth
I really don't want to sound
like I'm over doing it with this review. If it sounds like I'm making too
much out of their performance, it's because I appreciate good playing
whenever I hear it. Far too often in today's politically correct
environment, we are conditioned to applaud mediocre work done by mediocre
artists in the name of being fair and considerate to everyone equally. The
problem with this is that it lessens the value of that applause. If I lay
it on "a little thick" it's because I feel like I have to
emphasize that these performances are anything BUT mediocre.