In trying to place my most recent essay, "Dow",
somewhere in the outline on my Impressions and Reflections page, I had to decide
where articulation belongs in that order. Is articulation a physical rudiment or
is it a stylistic aspect of our art?
Certainly, articulation is a physical rudiment. I practice this rudiment every
day. But the subject of my "Dow" essay has nothing to do with the
rudiment of articulation.
I've been searching for a distinction between these parallel
usages of the term "articulation" for several years. I even wrote
about it a few times, but always in passing. It had never become it's own topic
until now.
What is it which distinguishes one use of the term
"Articulation" from the other?
Here's what I've come up with and I'd be more than happy
to discuss it with you HERE if you think I'm wrong. The first distinction is
that "Articulation" in the stylistic sense is a musical device reliant
upon differences from one style to the next. This variety is a musical
necessity. When all articulation is the same, the music becomes mechanical, no
better than the midi playback on your computer.
This is something I didn't realize when I wrote my book
called "The Physical Trumpet Pyramid". Much of
my writing about articulation in that book should have been reserved for a
discussion on the subject of style. But I didn't the distinction then which I
make now between the two usages of that term.
See what I mean?
Style
It's important that I emphasize the role articulation
plays in the overall style makeup. I like to define "Style" as those
things which are attached to the tone to create an overall sound picture. In a
master class at Rice University, Jim Thompson made a distinction between
"Sound" and "Tone Quality" saying that "Sound" is
"Tone Quality" with all the other stuff added; stuff like vibrato and
articulation. His comments support my point entirely. To me, "Style"
is those changes you make to the things attached to the tone, those things Jim
Thompson listed, including "Articulation".
Unless we are using musical effects, our tones should
never change, whether we're performing jazz, classical, rock or salsa. One of
the differences we make when we play in these different idioms is in our
articulation. I do not tongue the same way playing salsa as I do playing in an
orchestra. I do not tongue the same way playing jazz as I do in a brass quintet.
I do not tongue the same way playing Bach as I do playing Wagner.
The differences I'm referring to include not only the
striking point but also the shape of the tongue and the manner in which the note
is released. It also includes the speed of the tongue......not as in "How
fast can you tongue?" but as in "How quickly do you get it out of the
way?" Different tongue speeds create different articulation styles.
Rudiments
So, if the differences I'm talking about now do not fall
in the realm of physical rudiments, then what is "Articulation" when
you use it as a rudiment?
In my opinion, articulation exercises practiced as
rudiments are not articulation exercises at all. They are studies in
"Air" which are commonly referred to as "Flow Studies" in
today's trumpet community. When I practice "Articulation" as a
rudiment, I'm not thinking about articulation at all. I'm concentrating on my
air. I'm concentrating on playing that exercise as if it was what Herbert L.
Clarke called a "moving long tone".
The difference between these two usages of the word
"Articulation" helps to support my on going argument that people
should NEVER practice only rudiments. At least half of all your practice time
should be spent practicing literature. Worded conversely, the time you spend
practicing rudiments should never be more than half of your total practice
time.
Style is connected to literature. The style of a
composition is connected specifically to that composition. There are so many
styles required of us as trumpet players that physical rudiments could never
possibly prepare us for that sort of flexibility.
Articulation vs. Tonguing
I began this essay the way I begin most of my
essays.....without a title. But I knew when I got through it, I would have
something which represents the content of the essay. "Articulation vs.
Tonguing" helps to differentiate between the two topics. Instead of
referring to the rudiment as "Articulation", from now on I will call
it a "Tonguing Exercise". I will reserve the term
"Articulation" for its use in describing style.
Remember, you can discuss this essay on my Tiger Talk
Forums by clicking HERE.